Weaving Together the Normative and Regulative Roles of Government: How the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund's Responsible Conduct Is Shaping Firms' Cross-Border Investments
نویسنده
چکیده
Based on institutional theory, I extend research on the regulative role of national government in society, and suggest that government exerts important influences on firms‘ actions through the diffusion of norms. I suggest that by instituting the Council on Ethics which publicly ―censors‖ and ―certifies‖ the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund‘s cross-border investments, the Norwegian government contributes to the professionalization of responsible investment principles thus, playing a normative role in shaping firms‘ investments. Employing a quasi natural experiment, I find that focal Norwegian firms are more likely to make ―responsible‖ cross-border investments following the formation of the Council on Ethics in 2004 and the associated censorship announcements. Further, I find that the normative pressure for responsible investments is mediated by firms‘ imitation or overlap with the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund‘s investments. However, the mediated effect of normative pressure on responsible investments becomes weaker for government-owned firms. These findings highlight the importance of normative mechanisms through which government can influence firms‘ behavior, especially in contexts where regulatory authority may not hold. Moreover, these findings reveal the interplay among the normative, mimetic and regulative pressures, and the heterogeneity in the extent to which firms within the same country demonstrate institutional isomorphism.
منابع مشابه
Patterns and Trends in Sovereign Wealth Fund Investments: A Post-Crisis Descriptive Analysis
A nalyzing more than 9,400 investment transactions performed by 32 sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), from 23 countries, and targeted towards 77 countries, between 2010 and 2013, this study highlights some of the most important visible patterns and nuances in SWF investments. First, lion’s share of SWF investments are cross-border transactions that originated from and targeted towards hi...
متن کاملOvercoming Information Asymmetry in Internationalization: The Signaling Effect of a Sovereign Wealth Fund as an Institutional Intermediary
Combining perspectives from the literature on institutional activism and signaling theory, we suggest that a sovereign wealth fund (SWF), owing to its distinctive properties as a government-owned foreign institutional investor, serves as an intermediary signaler, providing cues about host countries’ institutional environment to internationalizing firms. By publicizing its investments and engagi...
متن کاملCross Border Mergers and Acquisitions by Indian firms-An Analysis of Pre and Post Merger performance
The corporate sector all over the world is restructuring its operations through different types of consolidation strategies like mergers and acquisitions in order to face challenges posed by the new pattern of globalization, which has led to the greater integration of national and international markets.. The intensity of cross-border operations recorded an unprecedented ...
متن کاملSovereign wealth funds in the mutation of global finance
Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) started making the headlines in the midst of the global financial crisis. They were welcomed neither by academics nor by politicians of Western countries. In a flurry of 2008 papers SWF were peremptorily told what they should and shouldn’t do. The reasoning underlying the prescriptive norms was flawed in two respects. First it simply equated SWFs to other instituti...
متن کاملOn the Path to UHC – Global Evidence Must Go Local to Be Useful; Comment on “Disease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy”
The Disease Control Priorities (DCP) publications have pioneered new ways of thinking about investing in health. We agree with Norheim, that a useful first step to advance efforts to translate DCP’s global evidence into local health priorities, is to develop a clear Theory of Change (ToC). However, a ToC that aims to define how global evidence (DCP and others) can be used to inform national pol...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Organization Science
دوره 24 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013